July Newsletter Now Available
July 27, 2009
Follow the link below for a copy of the July 2009 Newsletter.
President Obama Taps Long Time UMWA Official As MSHA Head
July 14, 2009
Obama Taps Main to Lead MSHA
Jul 9, 2009 1:10 PM
On July 6, President Obama ended the speculation about who would run the Mine Safety and Health Administration by sending long-time union man Joseph Main’s name to the Senate for confirmation.
Given the Democrats strong majority in the Senate, conformation is likely. Main is in line to replace Bush appointee Richard Stickler as assistant secretary of labor for mine safety and health.
Main began his career in coal mining in 1967 and was hired by the United Mine Workers of America in 1974 as special assistant to the international president. He took his first safety position two years later, and in 1982, he was named administrator of the UMWA Occupational Health and Safety Department; he held that position until 2004. He is currently a mining safety consultant.
UMWA was happy with the nomination and anticipating a heavier-handed regulatory agency.
“Joe is perhaps the most knowledgeable person about mine safety and health in the nation, and his experience was gained where it counts the most – fighting every day for over 30 years on behalf of miners’ health and safety,” said UMWA President Cecil Roberts in a prepared statement. “Joe has his work cut out for him. The Mine Safety and Health Administration has not lived up to its mandate from Congress to vigorously enforce mine health and safety laws and regulations the last eight years. The previous administration put mine production and company profitability ahead of miner safety. Fortunately, President Obama has sent a clear and consistent message that health and safety comes first in his administration.”
Rep Ben Chandler (D-Ky) threw his support behind Main in April when Main, former MSHA chief Davitt McAteer and Tony Mayville, director of Illinois’ Office of Land Management, were believed to be the leading candidates for the post.
Transportation Spending – Atlanta Gets Nothing, Atlanta Gets Plenty
July 14, 2009
Below is an article from the July 14th AJC dissecting transportation spending in the metro Atlanta vesus the state as a whole. Depending on who you ask, it is either plenty or not enough. Story below.
Road money splits state
Allocation pits metro Atlanta against rest.Atlanta’s per-capita advantage riles some, makes sense to others.
By Ariel Hart
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
For those who think state government is out to get metro Atlanta, you’re right —- just look at how the state is doling out Georgia’s stimulus road dollars.
For every thousand dollars metro Atlanta contributes to the economy, so far it’s getting back $1.37 from the stimulus road fund. The rest of the state is getting $2.02.
On the other hand, if you think metro Atlanta is the 800-pound gorilla getting more than its fair share, cheer up, you’ve got your evidence, too. From the same stimulus-funded road projects.
It’s all in how you look at the nearly $1 billion Georgia is getting for roads from the federal stimulus, and what you think of the way Georgia has allocated the first $591.8 million.
So far, metro Atlanta is getting $66.81 per person in the area, while the rest of the state is getting $56.06.
If one region has bragging rights —- or griping rights —- calculating which one it is is a tricky business. “I don’t really think the measures mean anything and too much should be written into them,” said A.J. Robinson, president of Central Atlanta Progress, a downtown Atlanta group.
For all the data, he points out, there are few new or major projects to brag about. Strict requirements that the projects be ready-to-go favored re-pavings and repairs, and they have made up the majority of the projects. Those are necessary but more mundane than brand-new roads or bridges that could make a dent in congestion and a big impression on drivers. Almost all are projects that were previously approved, so they have merely been saved from funding cuts.
Also, in order to spread the financial benefit to as much of the state as possible, the state Department of Transportation decided early on to do a lot of smaller projects rather than concentrating the money in a few big ones.
The $300 million that has yet to be allocated may produce more new and desirable projects, since planners have had a few months to finish preparatory work, rather than just picking whatever was ready to go.
In any case, the point of the stimulus wasn’t transportation, so much as propping up the economy by pumping money into paychecks, fast.
“The main point of the stimulus is to create jobs and sustain the jobs that are already in the industry,” said Gerald Ross, chief engineer of the state DOT.
What the stimulus road money has mostly done so far in Georgia is prevent some layoffs among road contractors. Those jobs often reside in the general area where the projects are located, though not necessarily in the same county.
Georgia is expecting $932 million altogether for roads. Part of that goes directly to urban areas, but the state controls the majority. More than half has already been allocated. A separate, smaller pot of money is going to mass transit systems such as MARTA.
Officials from cities across the United States voiced concern from the beginning of the stimulus that they wouldn’t get their fair share. Because the states, not city governments, would be dividing up much of the highway money, they feared that rural and exurban politics would hold sway, as they often do in state legislatures.
DOT spokesman David Spear said DOT used only objective criteria, like the rating of a road’s pavement or concrete deterioration, to rate projects’ worthiness and rank them for a chance at funding.
Still, the result appears differently to different people. Some city of Atlanta officials remain concerned, saying sending so much money away from metro Atlanta is inefficient.
“The metro region is by far the economic engine for the entire state,” said Luz Borrero, deputy chief operating officer for the city of Atlanta, noting that’s a role expected to grow. “We don’t believe the current investments are designed to keep up with that growth.”
The director of the University of Georgia’s Selig Center for Economic Growth agreed that the money should go where the economy is.
“We got a stimulus package that in my opinion is kind of low in terms of its economic stimulus per dollar, and high in political stimulus per dollar,” said the director, Jeffrey Humphreys.
A spokesman for Gov. Sonny Perdue bridled at such criticism of the allocations, and points out that metro Atlanta got more per person so far. “If the last year has taught us anything, it’s that you can find an economist to say anything,” said the spokesman, Chris Schrimpf.
It’s that per-capita advantage to Atlanta that bothers another economist, Rajeev Dhawan, director of the Economic Forecasting Center at Georgia State University. Simply put, the money should go where the people are, he said.
“That’s what determines the need,” Dhawan said.
When he learned that economists differed on which measure to take, Dhawan was not surprised. “It’s like defining beauty, you know?” he said.
Road stimulus allocations, so far
These figures are from cost estimates for projects that Gov. Sonny Perdue has approved so far from the $932 million for highways that Georgia expects to receive from the federal stimulus.
Metro Atlanta:
Total project dollars so far: $352,705,392
Per capita: $66.81
Per $1,000 of gross domestic product: $1.37
Rest of Georgia:
Total project dollars so far: $239,148,263
Per capita: $56.06
Per $1,000 of gross domestic product: $2.02
Sources: Office of Gov. Sonny Perdue; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis; U.S. Census; (latest figures: GDP 2006; census 2007)
